Revision: Edition, January 1, ; Published Date: January ; Status: Active, Most Current; Document Language: English; Published By: ASME. 15 Feb Hi, I’m looking for: ASME STS Steel Stacks, if someone could upload it, would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much in. Title, ASME STS Steel Stacks. Publisher, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Length, 96 pages. Export Citation, BiBTeX EndNote RefMan.
|Published (Last):||8 December 2013|
|PDF File Size:||2.95 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.2 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I have run this by my senior guys and in the local office, and while a few want to think about it for a while I know Handbook 3rd page Chimneys Steel stacks 9. One issue with that is the ASME cases we use to check thickness. Equation says i cant go above 16mm when using the design cases that result in a requirement of 22mm If your shell is thick you don’t need to check those and you only need to check the requirements of AISC.
Please copy and paste asme sts-1-2011 embed script to where you want asme sts-1-2011 embed Embed Script. With axme reference to height in the prerequisite it was just mind-boggling.
D and t are intimately related in this type of buckling problem. Solving for Sbl in the asme asme sts-1-2011 combined long.
Detailed colour maps of stresses in the lower part of the stack for the asme sts-1-2011 and corroded condition are further represented in Figure 11 to illustrate asme sts-1-2011 small amplitudes observed in that part of the chimney. I guess the basic question is: I do not know if it means. A comparison between the base shear and bending moments calculated on the basis of the static procedure and of the response spectrum analysis is asme sts-1-2011 in Table 15, considering a response factor R of 2.
Keep in mind, asme sts-1-2011 equation has no relation to loads, height, wind, eq, ect. Fellow Engineers, I am running into an international difference in steel stack design. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.
Ill write a little more later as it has been a hectic daybut perhaps these asme sts-1-2011 may spark some of your asme sts-1-2011 knowledge on the subject. So, it shouldn’t be hard to wrap your head around this, but it’s a min.
ASME STS-1 Steel-Stackspdf – Free Download PDF
Alternatively, asme sts-1-2011 must increase if you want to work at a higher buckling stress, still less than. If this assme the case i would think there would be thorough documentation on the subject. Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!
What asme sts-1-2011 you do when equation is not satisfied? Any clarification or direction you could provide would be appreciated.
Again, does this thought and design process, when eq is not satisfied, coincide with the srs-1-2011 design of the ASME? I still think this would be a real interesting question to ask ASME. There will be a blip in our design criteria, and asme sts-1-2011 our design approach as we move from one theoretical regime, or as,e regime to another. A lot of variance in asme sts-1-2011. It is a prerequisite to use the cases for allowable stress design per the asme STS1.
Download a few pages asne that so I can see what they are doing, and what their formulas and load cases look asme sts-1-2011. I think you are asme sts-1-2011 about contacting ASME about this, but im still hoping im missing something obvious here.
Please note that since this is xts-1-2011 personal opinion of a committee member, it is not endorsed by ASME. The stack design was based on the following codes: These simplifications allowed for easier result handling and maintained intact the principal horizontal actions asme sts-1-2011 structural schemes.
You would still follow STS for other aspects of the design Vortex shedding, etc.
Finally, the response spectrum analysis results based on the first 7 modes and on an SRSS combination are presented in Table 16, and colour maps of the stresses are shown in Figures 9 and 10 for the asje chimney conditions, NTNC and TC, considering independently combinations of the seismic forces along X asme sts-1-2011 Y directions with asme sts-1-2011 along direction Z.
Notice the reference and similarities to the ASME.
Design of stacks
Before i can debate which method is acceptable i have to understand why on Earth the ASME would be limiting thickness based on Asme sts-1-2011 in steel stacks. Thank you for interesting in our services.
Can sts-12011 suggest the best way to contact ASME with something like this? I actually found some older books on buckling that may point me in the right direction near the end of the day today. And here is where the above mentioned Loads, height, wind, eq, ice, etc all come into play We sts–2011 the sts-1-20111 automated with excel and STAAD and I can see asme sts-1-2011 the thickness provided asme sts-1-2011 my European colleagues of mm are required at the base for this stack to pass design.
I have brough this issue to 3 or 4 of asme sts-1-2011 senior US structural engineers and they have all be puzzled by this mostly by the fact that they havnt noticed this stipulation in previous designs.
ASME STS Steel Stacks – Google Books
However, for the purpose of comparison, the loads determined according to the static sts-1-201 procedure have been calculated and are summarised in Table 13 considering the asme sts-1-2011 two modes in each xts-1-2011. The allowable longitudinal compressive stresses due asme sts-1-2011 vertical load and and bending moment can be determined by: Must go, asme sts-1-2011 perhaps this will spark your thoughts.
Typically this condition occurs when we have a relative thick shell, and so my conclusion was that it behaves more as a “Beam” and we can ignore local buckling concerns of a thin wall shell. Now I have to stop and read chap.